|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |
Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
6355
   |
Posted - 2014.11.17 15:34:14 -
[1] - Quote
HD textures, yes, they would make details look great, because with this new engine they sinked somewhere.
Recon makes them stronger
|
Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
6360
|
Posted - 2014.11.17 16:38:32 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Salvo wrote:chaosjj wrote:Will the incursus-variants recieve their own hull variants like the moa hulls have? Yes, the hull variations for the Ishkur and the Enyo will make a reappearance in a later release, as they are not complete yet. As with the initial Moa redesign, we've updated the T2 variants with the new redesigned T1 hull until the T2 geometry is ready.
Don't forget about Ishkur's lance, it has to get bigger in tech2 variant.
Recon makes them stronger
|
Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
6391
|
Posted - 2014.11.18 17:29:06 -
[3] - Quote
Valterra Craven wrote:Warde Guildencrantz wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Owen E Vader wrote:Phoenix Jones wrote:that the new blackbird looks perfect.
WTF  What, it's glorious. Look at the old blackbird. Look at the new blackbird. How can anyone honestly say that they prefer the old one? I can honestly say I prefer the old one.
This was not a spaceship, this was a flying automatic spam forwarding server more than anything.
Recon makes them stronger
|
Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
6480
|
Posted - 2014.11.20 17:08:07 -
[4] - Quote
Maybe the worn look could be made an option for those ships, like when you take damage to armor in amount of 10000 times the 100% of standard amount of hp, it would became worn, until repackaged.
Recon makes them stronger
|
Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
6511
|
Posted - 2014.11.20 21:10:36 -
[5] - Quote
Quote:you ever repair holes in regular metal? It involves cleaning out damaged and rusty stuff and then welding "clean" metal into the hole. I assume nano-bots would be more effective.
What about paintjob? Do nanobots have spraying cans? 
Recon makes them stronger
|
Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
7190
|
Posted - 2014.12.04 11:05:35 -
[6] - Quote
Cassie Celestis wrote:Would have to agree on the Amarr ships case. Most of them need some recoloring/retexturing work done. Under most lighting effects the colors look either dirty or give out a paper-plastic feel. Hell its as if the Empire run out of armor plates and used dirty paper sheets or something. 
Cardboard and duct tape. \ /
Don't look any further for negative energy, you will find it by being lazy.
|
Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
7191
|
Posted - 2014.12.05 17:51:43 -
[7] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:EVE PBR RenderingNote the conspicuous absence of the Machariel, Vindicator, Nightmare and Bhaalgorn...
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5273961#post5273961
I like the PBR on ships averall, maybe there are some issues, but they will look into it. They constantly twaked those textures we had earlier and will tweak them constantly. Don't panic.
Don't look any further for negative energy, you will find it by being lazy.
|
Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
7259
|
Posted - 2014.12.07 14:52:15 -
[8] - Quote
I always thought that it is too much camouflage on a spaceship just for indicating its navy, only for indicating this, because who needs camouflage in space in the first place, you have cloaks. Old navy Is removing detailing optically, its big mess on a spaceship.
Grain is bigger and a little more subtle so it doesnt interfere so much with detailing. Still, it indicates Navy ship. It's better than former one.
It was too flat and too dark.
Detailing doesn't stand out like in new one.
Worse than the new one.
Don't look any further for negative energy, you will find it by being lazy.
|
Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
7263
|
Posted - 2014.12.08 10:32:57 -
[9] - Quote
Quote:you may have to ask CCP to add ship fuel, ships crew, crew upkeep, ship wear and tear
Already done that. About ship wear and tear even in this thread I think, when people complained about space dirt.
Don't look any further for negative energy, you will find it by being lazy.
|
|
|
| |
|